Open Scientific Review

Submit a Critique

Identify a possible error, limitation, contradiction, failed prediction, or better alternative. Serious criticism is part of the research process and will be reviewed on its evidence and reasoning.

Researchers combining ideas, research, sharing, and collaboration into one open scientific project

Strong criticism is not opposition to science. It is one of the ways scientific ideas are tested, repaired, and improved.

1. The Critique

What should be examined?

Critique title *Category *HGUT area or volumeExact claim, equation, page, or passage being challengedConcise summary *0/1200Full technical critique *0/20000Evidence, references, or reproducibility informationProposed correction or alternative

2. Supporting File

Attach calculations, code, or evidence

Choose one supporting filePDF, DOCX, TXT, MD, CSV, ZIP, PNG, JPG, or source-code file. Maximum 3.5 MB.

3. Contributor

How may we contact and credit you?

Name *Email *Institution or organizationBackgroundWebsite, ORCID, GitHub, or professional profile

Public recognition preference *

Credit my name and submitted affiliation if this critique is published.Credit my name, but do not publish my affiliation or profile.Publish the critique anonymously if it enters the public record.

Submission agreement

I confirm that this is a good-faith scientific or technical submission and that I have represented the evidence honestly.I understand that HGUT may review, test, quote, summarize, and publicly document this critique according to my recognition preference. Submission does not guarantee publication or agreement.

Fields marked with an asterisk are required. Please do not submit confidential, proprietary, export-controlled, or personally sensitive material.